- Category: Editorial
- Written by Rebel of Oz
- Hits: 4138
What is good for the gander is good for the goose
Have you ever got into a police checkpoint where drivers were pulled over for breath-testing? Did you get pulled over or did they wave you through? Chances are that if you are a middle-aged person driving a family car such as a Volvo station wagon with baby seats at the back, the police didn't stop you. On the other hand, if you were driving one of the car models popular with testosterone-ridden young lads such as a Subaru WRX, police pulled you over to test your breath.
Are the policemen running those controls prejudiced against young men driving sporty cars? You bet, and they have reason to be. They just need to look at the statistics on which demographic is most likely to be driving under the influence of alcohol and they know on what group of drivers to focus to make the best use of their time. It's called efficiency.
Equally, if a male teacher or pastor goes on holidays in countries such as Thailand and the Philippines, most parents would not be too keen on him being their children's boy scout leader. They might do that individual person wrong, but the likelihood that he's a paedophile is significantly higher than with someone who does not fit that profile, so why take the risk?! Profiling works, not only for the police, but also in marketing, where it's called market segmentation, and many other areas.
Where people suddenly get sensitive is when it comes to profiling by ethnicity. "Racial profiling" as its critics call it, is not very popular, especially within liberal circles, and if you look at the racial composition of the US prison population you quickly understand why. What is remarkable about it is the under-representation of Asians and Whites, and the over-representation of some other ethnicities. Liberals are quick to blame racial prejudices for the high conviction rate amongst Hispanics and Blacks. They claim that while these two groups might have a slightly higher delinquency rate than other sections of US society, mainly due to poverty and lack of opportunities, Hispanics and Blacks are grossly over-represented within the US prison population. According to many Liberals, policemen are more likely to charge, juries more likely to find guilty and judges more likely to imprison Hispanics and Blacks instead of giving them probation. In other words, their imprisonment and conviction rate is significantly higher than their actual delinquency rate, the percentage of crimes committed by them.
If such discrimination exists, it works both way, and Liberals are adamant that such favouritism exists when it comes to Whites. According to them, the percentage of crimes committed Whites is closer to their percentage in population than their conviction and incarceration rates indicate.
I don't have a problem with above mentioned logic. In fact, it makes a lot of sense. What's good for the gander though is also good for the goose. In US society, Jews are even more over-represented in the legal system than Whites, especially when it comes to leadership roles. What is more, most US citizens are at pains not to be suspected of even the slightest anti-Jewish feelings. Anything else would be social and career suicide. In such climate you would expect the actual percentage of crimes committed by Jews to be considerably higher than their conviction and imprisonment rate indicate. What's interesting about this is that Jews already make up 10% of the overall US federal and state prison population. That's 5 times their percentage of the US population. Going by above logic, the actual Jewish crime rate must be significantly higher than 10% of all crimes committed in the United States. How much higher we can only assume. Anecdotal evidence in the areas of white collar crime, sex slavery, child pornography, illegal organ trade, illegal arms trade, suggests that the Jewish 'market share' in overall crime is several times higher than their US incarceration rate of 10%.
Next question then is what causes the significant overrepresentation of Jews in the overall crime rate. Is it that Jews think that they can get away with it? But even if that was the case, thinking that you can get away with a crime and actually committing it are two different things, aren't they? So what exactly is it in the Jewish mindset that makes Jews think that it's okay to commit crimes?
There are obviously two things to do. One is to take measures ensuring that being Jewish doesn't give a criminal any competitive advantage in the sense of being more likely to get away with it. The other is addressing the Jewish cavalier attitude towards crime.
Unfortunately most people react quite irrationally when it comes to saying anything critical of Jews or offending any on their countless sensitivities. People are so paralysed with fear of being suspected of harbouring any bad feelings towards Jews that they don't dare to consider the possibility that there might be a statistically significant behavioural problem amongst Jews as a group. They don't even dare to mention that someone caught in the act of a crime was Jewish, even though they are quite frank about the racial background when it comes to 'white supremacists'.
The fear of the wrath of the Jews is so big, that even volunteer moderators on alternative media forums and social media websites routinely ban anyone posting articles shedding a light on some of the less flattering Jewish behavioural patterns. It should be evident for anyone able to think that sweeping those behaviour patterns under the carpet will only perpetuate the problem. If there is anecdotal evidence of a preeminent societally undesirable behaviour within any group of society, whether it is defined by age, gender or any other factor, you research it, warn the public and take measures to remedy it. We know that paedophiles are statistically overrepresented in professions with lots of exposure to children, so we create public awareness about it and introduce mechanisms such as sex offender registers to protect our children. There is no reason other than selfishness and cowardice to deal differently with Jewish crime.
therebel.org publishes, together with its own materials, articles, books, audios and videos published and copyrighted elsewhere. therebel.org does so under 'fair use' copyright provisions for educational purposes only. therebel.org doe not claim any copyright over the published materials, unless specifically stated. The views expressed and the links provided anywhere on the site are the personal views of individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of therebel.org or any of its members and associates.
Note: You need to register and log into the site to post comments. My apologies for the inconvenience caused by this anti-spam measure..