Welcome to the endgame in the 5000-year war between "Good" and "Evil"
One of the biggest puzzles of mankind is how human beings came into existence. The differences between animals and humans are too fundamental to be sufficiently explained by evolution theory. The genesis story of the bible makes even less sense. If an all powerful and all knowing god had created us, why did he do such a less than perfect job? A far more sensible explanation is that modern humans are the result of alien genetic manipulation. It would explain both our ape-like instincts and our unique mental abilities.
We know that our ancestors have been around for over 100,000 years. According to the alien genetic manipulation theory, every 5000 years our planet is visited by aliens from Planet X, the tenth planet in our solar system. In Assyrian records those aliens are known as Annunaki. The reason for the long periods in between visits is that it takes that long for Planet X to come close enough to Earth for the Annunaki to make the trip. On their second last visit, around 8,000 B.C., the Annunaki implanted a sufficient amount of their genes into humans to enable us to make the switch from primitive group hunting to agriculture in the area of the 'Fertile Crescent', encompassing today's Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Israel and Palestine, besides the south-eastern fringe of Turkey and the western fringe of Iran.
5,000 years later, on the following Annunaki expedition, further genetic manipulations resulted in the rise of more advanced state-like civilisations in Egypt, Mesopotamia, the Indus River and in China. Some humans were supposedly given extra rations of Annunaki genes to empower them to control their fellow humans on behalf of their alien masters. This is said to be the beginning of the ancient bloodlines of our ruling elite.
The aliens didn't conduct those experiments out of the goodness of their hearts, but in an effort to make us more useful for them. They needed us as workers, soldiers and slaves. What they were after is fairly obvious: gold. All ancient cultures had only one purpose, the production of gold and other precious metals for our visitors from space. The Annunaki didn't want to do the hard work of digging the gold out of the dirt themselves, so they created us and other humanoids like hobbles and Neanderthal men to do it for them.
The gods and demons of ancient religions are easily explained as descriptions of those alien visitors, as are the strikingly similar descriptions of dragons from different parts of the world. Most likely, Annunaki resemble reptiles, but have the ability of taking on other appearances.
During their last expedition a revolt broke out amongst the Annunaki, making them split into two warring camps. That conflict is reflected in the biblical story of Satan's revolt against God. The trigger for the revolt was an attempt of the leader of the Annunaki visitors to crack down on rampant fraternisation between Annunakis and humans, which was bound to create a hybrid race that one day could become a threat to the total control and exploitation by the Annunaki.
The camp of the rebels was able to win a significant followership amongst human leaders. The latter were more than happy to produce off-spring with Annunaki superpowers. What is more, the 'evil'' camp was more appealing to them because siding with 'Satan' was far more rewarding than the hypocritical demands of frugality and unconditional obedience demanded by 'God'. After all, why does the 'good shepherd' take so well care of his sheep? Because he wants their wool and meat.
The Annunakis left, but the human leaders of the two opposing camps have kept warring each other for the past 5000 years, Romans vs. Phoenicians, Hohenstaufens vs. Guelphs, Guelphs vs. Ghibellines, Medicis vs. Huguenots, Fascism vs. Communism and Freemasonry.
By the looks of it the Satanist camp is close to winning the 5000-year-war between "God" and "Satan". It would be oversimplifying though to describe this as a conflict between morally good and evil. From an ordinary 'sheep's' point of view, it's a case of the pot calling the kettle black. If the 'good' side is only after your wool and meet, you might as well have some fun in the 'evil' camp.
The solution to this dilemma is obviously not as simple as joining either side. My point is that in this 'Alien vs. Predator' conflict, it doesn't matter which of the two reptile camps wins, mankind always loses. The big challenge for us - regardless of the amount of Annunaki genes we carry in us - is to find a third option, in which we treat each other the way we would like to be treated if we were in the other person's shoes.
In the eternal battle between "good" and "evil" nothing is what it seems
We all have heard stories about politicians throwing the wildest insults and accusations at each other in parliament, but then hanging out together outside parliament like the best of friends. The reason for that phenomenon is of course that Western democracy is as much of a genuine competition as World Wresting Federation. Everything is scripted, just for show, and the competitors are all owned by the same people.
Revisionists have the tendency of looking at human history as an eternal battle between good and evil. But when we have a closer look, we quickly discover that is is not as simple as that. The descendants of the French Huguenots in the Southern states of the United States were no doubt fighting against evil when battling the troops of the North. So were the supporters of the Tsar when trying to overcome the Bolsheviks. But the Southerners were also defending a society that was based on slave labour. And their justification, that God wanted black people to be the slaves of Whites, is as outrageously racist and self-serving as the Talmudic claims that all non-Jews were animals in human shape created by God to enrich, amuse and serve Jews. Worse even the White Russian troops were defending a system that made its monarch the richest man on the planet, personally owning one sixth of the earth, while most of his subjects lived in abject poverty. The Russian Tsar and his family fully deserved the bullets in their heads as much as their Bolshevik murders, as the Southern plantation owners deserved to lose everything they owned.
In the eternal battle between "good" and "evil" nothing is what it seems. The reason why the "good" side is losing, is because it is so easy for the "evil" side to point out the other side's hypocrisy and flaws.
Human history is not an eternal battle between good and evil, but a battle between evil hypocrites and evil monsters. We shouldn't allow either side to make us choose between one or the other, like George W. Bush tried to make people chose between him and the "terrorists". Religion, unfortunately, doesn't give us any guidance. It's just another form of mind control. No different from political parties and politicians, religions and clergy can only survive and thrive if they prostitute themselves to the ruling elite.
Some of our readers will object to the last statement. They will claim Islam isn't like that. But ask yourself where the bulk of the money for Koran schools and other infrastructure is coming from. It's the big donors, more often than not rich Saudis like the Bin Ladens, who ultimately determine which flavour of Islam has the upper hand. It's these kind of people who ensure that Islam retains its backward, cruel and women suppressing image, making it easier for Israel and the West to suppress and exploit Muslims all over the world.
Christianity succeeded in the West Roman Empire because the Christian message of forgiveness of sins and life after death made it easier to control soldiers and slaves. Islam succeeded in the East Roman Empire and North Africa because Christian hating Jews provided political and financial support. In fact, both Mohammed's mother and first wife were Jewish, making the founder of Islam technically a Jew. It's those Jewish backers who 'created' Islam to destroy Christianity. It was those Talmudists who ensured that Islam retained the three most essential Jewish religious practices, circumcision, kosher slaughter and the prohibition of pork, and it was them who made sure that all the important positions in the Muslim Arab and Turkish empires, from the 'prime minister' to the tax man, were filled with Jews.
No, if we are looking for guidance for our actions, we can't find them outside, we have to look for it in ourselves. When faced with a decision that is affecting another person, we must ask us how would we want us to decide if we were in their shoes.
 I'm referring to Italian and Spanish fascism, not to the more complex National Socialism.
 The Muslim term for kosher food is hallal.